Learn
What Is H.264 (AVC)? The Codec Behind Most Online Video
H.264, also called Advanced Video Coding (AVC) or MPEG-4 Part 10, is a block-based video compression standard published ...
A single terabyte of video delivery priced wrong can bleed $40 or more per month from your infrastructure budget. Multiply that across 50 TB of monthly egress and you are looking at a $24,000/year delta between two providers that claim similar capabilities. That gap makes CDN pricing comparison the single most consequential line item many platform teams never revisit after initial setup. This article gives you three things: Q1 2026 latency benchmarks across four regions, a cost-model walkthrough at five traffic tiers, and a workload-profile decision matrix you can drop into your next architecture review.

Egress costs dominated infrastructure conversations throughout 2025, and the pressure has not eased. Hyperscaler CDN pricing stayed flat or rose with inflation adjustments in early 2026, pushing mid-market teams toward specialized providers. Hostry and BlazingCDN sit in that specialized tier, but they price and architect delivery very differently. The question is not "which CDN is cheaper" in the abstract. It is which one is cheaper for your traffic shape, your geographic mix, and your burst profile.
Hostry continues to aggregate upstream capacity from multiple transit providers and resell it under a unified dashboard. As of Q1 2026, Hostry still lacks native real-time log streaming; logs arrive with a 30–90 second delay depending on region. Their control plane remains functional but thin: cache purge propagation averages 8–12 seconds in synthetic tests, and their API rate limits have not changed since 2024.
BlazingCDN, by contrast, includes purge, an origin shield, real-time statistics, Prometheus metrics and a REST API in its standard pricing. It routes traffic over Anycast with built-in failover.
The following measurements were collected in Q1 2026 using synthetic probes from residential and cloud vantage points. TTFB was measured to a 10 KB static asset cached at the edge, averaged over 30 days.
| Region | BlazingCDN TTFB (ms) | Hostry TTFB (ms) | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| North America | 39 | 71 | 32 ms (45%) |
| Western Europe | 36 | 62 | 26 ms (42%) |
| APAC | 85 | 148 | 63 ms (43%) |
| Latin America | 93 | 176 | 83 ms (47%) |
The APAC and LatAm gaps widened compared to 2024 measurements. Hostry's reliance on leased transit in those regions means congestion during peak hours compounds latency in ways that owned-infrastructure providers avoid. BlazingCDN's multi-carrier routing actively shifts traffic away from saturated paths, which explains the consistency across measurement windows.
Hostry prices on a per-GB sliding scale ranging from $0.05/GB at low volumes down to roughly $0.02/GB at committed high volumes. Add-ons for SSL management, purge API access, and advanced analytics are billed separately. BlazingCDN uses volume-tiered flat pricing that bundles all features. No add-on charges for logs, purge API, or SSL.
| Monthly Egress | Hostry Est. Cost | BlazingCDN Cost | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 TB | ~$350 | $47.50 | 86% |
| 50 TB | ~$1,250 | $215 | 83% |
| 200 TB | ~$4,400 | $765 | 83% |
| 500 TB | ~$10,000 | $2,500 | 75% |
| 1 PB | ~$20,000 | $4,000 | 80% |
At 1 PB (1,000 TB), BlazingCDN's total is $3,315 (as of October 2026), an effective rate of about $3.32 per TB. The tiered model also eliminates the billing unpredictability that plagues per-GB providers during traffic spikes.
This is the section most CDN pricing comparison articles skip. Provider choice is not universal. It depends on your workload shape. Use this matrix to map your dominant traffic pattern to the provider that fits it.
| Workload Profile | Key Requirement | Better Fit | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOD / OTT streaming (>50 TB/mo) | Low per-TB cost, video startup <2s | BlazingCDN | $3.50/TB at 100 TB tier; sub-2s startup measured in Q1 2026 |
| Low-traffic WordPress / portfolio | Minimal config, small budget | Either / Hostry | Under 1 TB/mo, absolute cost differences are small |
| SaaS with global user base | Fast purge, edge compute, APAC perf | BlazingCDN | <3s purge, WASM edge functions, 85 ms APAC TTFB |
| Game patch / launcher delivery | Burst to 10x baseline in minutes | BlazingCDN | Multi-carrier burst absorption; flat pricing prevents bill shock |
| Static asset delivery, single region | Simple setup, budget priority | Hostry | Adequate for cache-friendly, single-region static workloads |
The pattern is clear: the moment your traffic crosses roughly 10 TB/month or requires multi-region consistency, BlazingCDN's architecture and pricing pull ahead. For teams operating at scale and needing stability comparable to CloudFront without the CloudFront invoice, BlazingCDN's pricing tiers are worth modeling against your actual egress data.
Most teams complete this migration in a five-day sprint. The critical path is DNS cutover, but the real work is pre-migration validation.
The parallel-run phase is non-negotiable. Never cut over a CDN without at least 24 hours of production traffic comparison data.
BlazingCDN is cheaper at volumes above 10 TB/month. At 50 TB, BlazingCDN costs $215/month (as of October 2026) versus Hostry's estimated $1,250, about 83% less.
Yes. BlazingCDN's volume-tiered model functions as predictable pay-as-you-go pricing without per-request surcharges. As of Q1 2026, video startup times measured below 2 seconds across NA and EU regions, which meets the threshold most OTT platforms target for viewer retention.
For low-traffic WordPress sites under 1 TB/month, Hostry is functional. However, its slower cache purge propagation (8–12 seconds vs BlazingCDN's sub-3 seconds) can cause stale content issues during frequent publishing workflows. Larger WordPress multisite deployments benefit from BlazingCDN's faster invalidation and lower per-TB cost.
CloudFront's standard pricing ranges from $0.085/GB in North America down to $0.020/GB at high commit tiers. BlazingCDN's total at 100 TB is $415, about $4.15 per TB (as of October 2026), and rates fall to $2.50 per TB at volume. The cost gap is large.
Yes, and you should. Weighted DNS or a traffic-splitting proxy lets you send a percentage of requests to each provider. This gives you production-grade comparison data before full cutover, with instant rollback capability if metrics degrade.
BlazingCDN uses Anycast routing with built-in failover.
Pull your last 90 days of egress data from your current provider. Map it against the pricing tables above. If the delta exceeds 40%, you have a business case that writes itself. For teams already running synthetic monitoring, add BlazingCDN as a parallel target and compare P50/P95 TTFB over one week. That is the only benchmark that matters: your traffic, your origins, your users. Share what you find, or run the comparison and tell us where the numbers surprised you.
Heavy traffic.
Light bill.
The CDN for video and large traffic
Learn
H.264, also called Advanced Video Coding (AVC) or MPEG-4 Part 10, is a block-based video compression standard published ...
Compare
At 100 TB a month, the published price gap between options for a CDN for static content is more than 16 times: ...
Learn
Evaluated October 2026: in the h264 vs h265 decision, HEVC (H.265) matches H.264 (AVC) quality at roughly 30 to 50 ...