Learn
Best Video Streaming CDN in 2026? 7 Providers Compared With Real Performance Data
Best CDN for Video Streaming in 2026: 7 Providers Compared A single rebuffer event at the two-second mark costs you 8% ...
At 250 TB per month, CDN77 pricing lands around $990 on its committed Growth tier — roughly $3.96 per TB before egress overages. That number sounds clean until you map it against what the same volume costs on Fastly, CloudFront, or a per-TB challenger like BlazingCDN, where the spread can hit 20× depending on region and commit. This article gives you the 2026 price tables, a worked 250 TB cost model, and a workload-profile decision matrix so you can pick the CDN that actually minimizes your bill instead of the one with the friendliest landing page.

CDN77 sells two distinct things: traffic delivery and object storage. They bill independently, and the confusion between them is where most procurement estimates go wrong. As of Q1 2026, the structure breaks down like this.
The 2026 change worth flagging: CDN77 has leaned harder into commit-based discounting, meaning the PAYG rate and the effective committed rate now diverge more than they did in 2024. If you are still on month-to-month billing at steady volume, you are almost certainly overpaying.
List price is a starting point, not an answer. The numbers below are 2026 reference rates for North America / Europe egress, normalized to per-GB where each vendor publishes it. Treat them as directional — every enterprise contract moves these.
| Provider | Effective per-GB (NA/EU) | Billing model | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDN77 | ~$0.004 at 250 TB commit; higher on PAYG | Commit + PAYG overage | Mid-volume media, live streaming |
| Cloudflare | Free tier; paid plans bundle egress, enterprise custom | Flat plan + add-ons | Web apps, mixed workloads, ease of use |
| Fastly | ~$0.08–$0.12 list, volume discounts | PAYG + commit | Real-time control, edge compute, instant purge |
| Amazon CloudFront | ~$0.085 first tier, drops with volume | Tiered PAYG + private pricing | AWS-native stacks |
| BlazingCDN | $0.004 at 25 TB, down to $0.002 at 2 PB+ | Volume tiers + overage | High-volume media, software, large-file delivery |
The headline takeaway: against CloudFront and Fastly list rates, CDN77's committed Growth tier is dramatically cheaper for raw egress. Against per-TB challengers, CDN77 stops being the value leader once you cross into sustained high volume, because its commit floor is fixed while challenger tiers keep dropping the marginal rate.
Abstract per-GB numbers hide real money. Here is what 250 TB/month of steady NA/EU delivery costs across the field, using 2026 reference rates and assuming you size each plan correctly.
The pattern is clear. For pure egress at mid volume, CDN77 and per-TB providers occupy a different universe than the hyperscaler CDNs on list pricing. The decision between CDN77 and a challenger comes down to features, not headline cost, until your volume scales past the single-commit ceiling.
"Cheapest" is the wrong question. "Cheapest for this workload" is the right one. Map your dominant traffic shape to the column that wins.
| Workload profile | Cost-optimal pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| VOD / large-file streaming, 100 TB+ | BlazingCDN or CDN77 Enterprise | Per-TB economics dominate; cache-hit ratio carries the bill. |
| Bursty live events | CDN77 / Fastly | Live ingest tooling and instant purge matter more than per-GB. |
| Dynamic web apps | Cloudflare | Bundled egress and developer ergonomics win at low-to-mid volume. |
| AWS-native pipelines | CloudFront | Origin colocation and IAM integration offset the premium. |
| Software / patch distribution at PB scale | BlazingCDN | Marginal rate to $0.002/GB at 2 PB+ undercuts everyone. |
This is the angle most pricing comparisons skip. They rank providers in a flat list; in practice the winner flips entirely based on whether your traffic is cacheable static media, real-time dynamic, or origin-coupled.
For media and software teams whose bill is dominated by egress, the marginal per-GB rate is the only variable that compounds. BlazingCDN delivers stability and fault tolerance comparable to Amazon CloudFront while staying significantly more cost-effective — a meaningful advantage for enterprises and large corporate clients. Pricing is volume-based and scales down with commitment: starting at $4 per TB ($0.004/GB) for up to 25 TB, and dropping to $2 per TB ($0.002/GB) past 2 PB. Customers including Sony rely on it for 100% uptime, flexible configuration, and fast scaling under demand spikes. If your model is high-volume media delivery, run your own numbers against BlazingCDN's media delivery economics before signing a fixed commit.
Cloudflare bundles egress into flat plans with a free entry tier, so at low volume it can be effectively free where CDN77 charges per GB. At sustained high traffic, CDN77's committed Growth tier (~$990 for 250 TB) often beats Cloudflare's enterprise add-on egress, but the comparison depends entirely on your contract terms.
The committed Growth plan covers 250 TB for roughly $990/month as of 2026, putting the effective rate near $0.004 per GB. Traffic past the commit bills at higher PAYG rates, and storage is separate, so audit your overage history before assuming the flat number holds.
On list pricing, yes — CDN77's committed egress undercuts Fastly's published per-GB rates by a wide margin at 100 TB+. Fastly justifies its premium with real-time configuration, edge compute, and instant purge, so the right pick depends on whether you need that programmability.
For pure VOD and large-file delivery at scale, per-TB providers like BlazingCDN typically win on marginal cost, reaching $0.002/GB past 2 PB. CDN77 Enterprise remains competitive when you need integrated live streaming tooling in the same contract.
Yes. Object storage starts near $200/month for 10 TB at roughly $0.02/GB, and delivery egress is billed on top. Many teams underestimate total cost by modeling only one of the two.
Enterprise contracts are custom-negotiated against projected volume and bundle live streaming, dedicated support, and raw log access. There is no public rate; the higher your committed volume, the lower your effective per-GB price.
This week, pull your last three months of egress by region and cache-hit ratio, then model your true blended per-GB rate — not the headline plan price. Plug that volume into each provider's tier and watch where the marginal rate crosses over. If you are above 100 TB/month and still paying list rates anywhere, you have a renegotiation or a migration on the table. What is your current effective cost per delivered TB, and which workload profile in the matrix above does it actually match?
Learn
Best CDN for Video Streaming in 2026: 7 Providers Compared A single rebuffer event at the two-second mark costs you 8% ...
Learn
Video CDN Providers Compared: BlazingCDN vs Cloudflare vs Akamai for OTT If you are choosing a video CDN for an OTT ...
Learn
Video CDN Pricing Explained: How to Stop Overpaying for Streaming Bandwidth Video already accounts for 38% of total ...